| | |
Variety and Frequency in separate models
|
Variety and Frequency in the same model
|
|---|
|
Outcome
|
Exposure
|
Exp. β
|
95% CI
|
P-value
|
% variance explained by exposure
|
Exp. β
|
95% CI
|
P-value
|
% variance explained by exposure
|
|---|
|
MVPA
|
Variety
|
1.04
|
1.02
|
1.06
|
<0.001
|
1.18
|
1.01
|
0.98
|
1.04
|
0.402
|
1.36
|
|
Frequency
|
1.04
|
1.02
|
1.06
|
<0.001
|
1.32
|
1.03
|
1.00
|
1.06
|
0.051
| |
- Variety and Frequency were transformed to z-scores so effect sizes are directly comparable.
- Associations were tested using multilevel linear regression.
- Models were adjusted for age, sex, parental education level and age standardised body mass index (BMI).
- MVPA; moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was log transformed for analysis. The β coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were then exponentiated for interpretation. Exponentiated β (Exp. β) and 95% CI represents a ratio of geometric means and can be interpreted in the same way as odds ratios. i.e. Exp. β and 95% CI <1 equates to a negative association whereas Exp. β and 95% CI >1 equates to a positive association.
- P-value for significance of the association of Variety or Frequency with physical activity.
