Skip to main content

Table 3 Social capital and HIV-antiretroviral adherence among people living with HIV

From: Associations between the legal context of HIV, perceived social capital, and HIV antiretroviral adherence in North America

Site

N

Social Capital μ(sd)

Adherence % past 30-day μ(sd)

Adherence 100%a n(%)

Prescribed HIV antiretroviral therapy n(%)

Canada

100

2.54 (0.56)

84.1 (24.7)

37 (43.5)

85 (85)

Puerto Rico

100

2.74 (0.52)

88.7 (20.1)

51 (56)

91 (91)

California

300

2.53 (0.59)

82.7 (23.2)

86 (36.8)

234 (78)

Hawaii

100

2.73 (0.56)

89.6 (14)

32 (35.2)

91(91)

Illinois

95

2.66 (0.59)

83.4 (24.4)

29 (36.3)

80 (84)

Massachusetts

200

2.67 (0.54)

84.8 (23.2)

70 (40.7)

172 (86)

New Jersey

100

2.64 (0.48)

85.1 (21.9)

36 (43.4)

83 (83)

New York

100

2.69 (0.59)

83 (23.7)

31 (37.8)

82 (82)

North Carolina

200

2.79 (0.55)

86.1 (19.7)

78 (43.3)

180 (90)

Ohio

150

2.59 (0.52)

86.1 (20.9)

53 (41.4)

128 (85)

Texas

228

2.64 (0.52)

89.5 (19)

109 (55.6)

196 (86)

Washington

200

2.54 (0.56)

85.8 (23.8)

87 (51.8)

168 (84)

Total

1,873

2.63 (0.55)

85.7 (21.8)

699 (44)

1,590 (84.9)

  1. Note. a = computed from 30-day adherence data; possible mean social capital scores range from 1 indicating poor social capital to 4 indicating high social capital.