Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 19 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - nicole reilly |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 19 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 14 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patricia Dietz |
| 19 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - joseph canterino |
| 7 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Fisher |
| 21 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - nicole reilly |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 21 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 27 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patricia Dietz |
| 12 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - joseph canterino |
| 27 Mar 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Fisher |
| 18 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - nicole reilly |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 12 May 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jane Fisher |
| 30 May 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - nicole reilly |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 30 May 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Jun 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 Jul 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-632 |
You can find further information about peer review here.