Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 May 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 30 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Revati Phalkey |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 30 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 10 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Cherian |
| 12 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Arun Humne |
| 28 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Revati Phalkey |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 28 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 1 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Revati Phalkey |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 1 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 18 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Arun Humne |
| 30 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Cherian |
| 22 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Revati Phalkey |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 22 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Mar 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 Apr 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-317 |
You can find further information about peer review here.