Skip to main content

Table 4 Respondentsā€™ views on policy implementation and impact ā€“ percentage agreement for non-smokers and smokers

From: Implementation of a smoke-free policy in a high secure mental health inpatient facility: staff survey to describe experience and attitudes

Statement

% Agreement (Strongly Agree/Agree)

Ā 

All respondents

Non-smokers

Smokers

Significance ā€“ Pearson Ļ‡2(2 tailed)

Most patients have been prepared for smoking cessation before they arrive at the hospital

38.1

40.4

28.6

Ļ‡2ā€‰=ā€‰3.84; dfā€‰=ā€‰2; Pā€‰=ā€‰0.146

Being in a totally smoke-free environment makes patient care easier

57.0

63.7

21.4

Ļ‡2ā€‰=ā€‰9.36; dfā€‰=ā€‰2; Pā€‰=ā€‰0.009

The smoke-free policy has made patient behaviour more difficult to manage

23.8

22.2

30.8

Ļ‡2ā€‰=ā€‰4.96; dfā€‰=ā€‰2; Pā€‰=ā€‰0.084

Mental health patients who are not allowed to smoke become more aggressive and hard to manage

19.8

16.5

38.5

Ļ‡2ā€‰=ā€‰8.29; dfā€‰=ā€‰2; Pā€‰=ā€‰0.016

Mental health patients who smoke are unlikely to ever quit long term

40.6

37.4

61.5

Ļ‡2ā€‰=ā€‰2.79; dfā€‰=ā€‰2; Pā€‰=ā€‰0.247

Living in the smoke-free hospital has had a positive effect on the health of patients.

85.5

88.6

61.5

Ļ‡2ā€‰=ā€‰6.87; dfā€‰=ā€‰2; Pā€‰=ā€‰0.032

Working in a smoke-free environment has had a positive impact on my health

79.0

86.8

23.1

Ļ‡2ā€‰=ā€‰29.37; dfā€‰=ā€‰2; pā€‰<ā€‰0.001