Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 12 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sarah Damery |
| 27 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Hewitson |
| 31 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carolyn Rutter |
| 2 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ryan Courtney |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 2 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 6 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sarah Damery |
| 16 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carolyn Rutter |
| 19 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Hewitson |
| 2 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ryan Courtney |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 2 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 15 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Hewitson |
| 30 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlotte Price |
| 4 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ryan Courtney |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 4 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 17 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Charlotte Price |
| 23 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Hewitson |
| 19 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ryan Courtney |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 19 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 17 Jan 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Mar 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-248 |
You can find further information about peer review here.