Skip to main content

Table 3 Factors associated with levels of activity satisfaction/burden in HPVs: multinomial logistic regression analysis

From: Exploring the ideal combination of activity satisfaction and burden among health promotion volunteers: a cross-sectional study in Japan

  

Group B

Group C

Group D

High satisfaction-high burden

Low satisfaction-low burden

Low satisfaction-high burden

OR

(95% CI)

OR

(95% CI)

OR

(95% CI)

Demographics

       

 Age

(Every 5 years)

0.67**

(0.53–0.85)

0.84

(0.63–1.12)

0.75*

(0.59–0.96)

 Interest in being a volunteer

Low

1.25

(0.68–2.30)

0.96

(0.45–2.07)

1.59

(0.85–2.96)

 Self-rated health

Poor

0.90

(0.31–2.58)

1.68

(0.52–5.41)

2.61*

(1.05–6.51)

Antecedents

       

 Motivation at the end of the HPV training course

Low

3.65**

(1.74–7.66)

0.76

(0.23–2.50)

4.94***

(2.35–10.36)

 Climate of the HPV organization

Bad

1.73

(0.92–3.25)

1.45

(0.66–3.19)

3.91***

(2.05–7.49)

 Social support from colleagues

Low

2.08*

(1.09–3.97)

1.18

(0.54–2.59)

1.32

(0.66–2.62)

 Social support from community members

Low

0.89

(0.47–1.68)

1.60

(0.71–3.59)

1.96

(0.98–3.93)

 Head of the neighborhood association  uncooperative regarding HPV activities

Agree

1.88

(0.92–3.84)

2.70*

(1.17–6.26)

2.50*

(1.24–5.04)

  1. OR: odds ratio. 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
  2. *** p < 0.001. ** p < 0.01. * p < 0.05. p < 0.10.
  3. Reference category for dependent variable was group A (high satisfaction-low burden).
  4. Age, interest in being a volunteer, self-rated health, motivation at the end of the HPV training course, climate of the HPV organization, social support from colleagues, social support from community members, the relationship with the head of the neighborhood association, and affiliations (city) were adjusted for in the model.