Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 May 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
4 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Monica Perracini |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
4 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
1 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Bohannon |
21 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laurence Seematter-Bagnoud |
21 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Monica Perracini |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Bohannon |
14 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Laurence Seematter-Bagnoud |
5 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Monica Perracini |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
5 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
13 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-182 |
You can find further information about peer review here.