Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
22 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Marelign Tilahun |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
22 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
21 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Marelign Tilahun |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
7 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ken Checinski |
13 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jan van Amsterdam |
14 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Marelign Tilahun |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
14 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
14 Sep 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Marelign Tilahun |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
14 Sep 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
9 Oct 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Marelign Tilahun |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
9 Oct 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
21 Oct 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Marelign Tilahun |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
21 Oct 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
31 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jan van Amsterdam |
24 Nov 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ken Checinski |
4 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Marelign Tilahun |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
4 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
12 Dec 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
18 Dec 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1199 |
You can find further information about peer review here.