Panel 1: Logistic regression of fully-adjusted model | |||
---|---|---|---|
Predicted probability of youths’ weekly VPA participation (%) | |||
Simulation scenarios: | Full sample | Male sample | Female sample |
Baseline (i.e. no change) in father’s past weekly VPA frequency | 72.05 | 76.26 | 69.27 |
A one SD increase in father’s past weekly VPA frequencya | 78.30 | 78.52 | 78.60 |
Father’s past weekly VPA frequency set to 3.0b | 74.47 | 77.30 | 72.92 |
Father’s past weekly VPA frequency set to zero | 66.67 | 74.46 | 60.83 |
Panel 2: Negative binomial regression of fully-adjusted model | |||
Predicted rate of youths’ weekly VPA frequency (days/week) | |||
Simulation scenarios: | Full sample | Male sample | Female sample |
Baseline (i.e. no change) in father’s past weekly VPA frequency | 2.85 | 3.22 | 2.42 |
A one SD increase in father’s past weekly VPA frequencya | 3.06 | 3.18 | 2.76 |
Father’s past weekly VPA frequency set to 3.0b | 2.93 | 3.20 | 2.52 |
Father’s past weekly VPA frequency set to zero | 2.71 | 3.25 | 2.19 |