Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Elisabetta Pandolfi |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
24 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bruno Christian Ciancio |
3 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sean O'Leary |
24 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fredi Alexander Diaz-Quijano |
13 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Elisabetta Pandolfi |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fredi Alexander Diaz-Quijano |
3 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sean O'Leary |
4 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bruno Christian Ciancio |
25 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Elisabetta Pandolfi |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
30 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Elisabetta Pandolfi |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
30 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
12 Nov 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
15 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-984 |
You can find further information about peer review here.