Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
13 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Hanna Hultin |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
15 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thorne Wallman |
18 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harald Reiso |
22 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Justin Scanlan |
29 Jun 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Hanna Hultin |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
29 Jun 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
15 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Justin Scanlan |
17 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thorne Wallman |
17 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Harald Reiso |
30 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Hanna Hultin |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
30 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
14 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Justin Scanlan |
25 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Hanna Hultin |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
5 Oct 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Oct 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-861 |
You can find further information about peer review here.