Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
20 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stefan Acosta |
21 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Powell |
3 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Choke |
3 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Augusto Hasiak Santo |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
3 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Augusto Hasiak Santo |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
7 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Stefan Acosta |
10 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Powell |
21 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Choke |
24 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Augusto Hasiak Santo |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
30 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Augusto Hasiak Santo |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
30 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
8 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Powell |
10 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Choke |
25 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Augusto Hasiak Santo |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
25 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
6 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Powell |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Publishing | ||
3 Oct 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
10 Oct 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-859 |
You can find further information about peer review here.