Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
8 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Diana Burgess |
23 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ross O'Hara |
13 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Fredric Wolinsky |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
14 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Fredric Wolinsky |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
14 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
27 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ross O'Hara |
30 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Diana Burgess |
6 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Fredric Wolinsky |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
6 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
11 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Diana Burgess |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Publishing | ||
25 Sep 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Sep 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-827 |
You can find further information about peer review here.