From: School environment as predictor of teacher sick leave: data-linked prospective cohort study
Teacher characteristics | Unadjusted model | Model I* | Model II** | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
Women vs. men | 1.41 (1.08-1.86) | 0.01 | 1.45 (1.10-1.91) | 0.009 | ||
Age/10 years | 0.66 (0.57-0.76) | <0.001 | 0.67 (0.58-0.77) | <0.001 | ||
Special vs. general education (2004–05) | 0.82 (0.49-1.38) | 0.46 | 0.90 (0.53-1.50) | 0.68 | ||
Fixed-term vs. permanent job (2004–05) | 0.88 (0.62-1.26) | 0.49 | 0.89 (0.62-1.27) | 0.52 | ||
Short-term sick leaves in 01–02: yes vs. no | 3.05 (2.22-4.19) | <0.001 | 3.14 (2.28-4.32) | <0.001 | ||
School characteristics | ||||||
School location/follow-up time: 2 vs. 4 years | 1.20 (0.79-1.83) | 0.39 | 1.22 (0.78-1.91) | 0.38 | ||
High vs. small PTR at school*** | 0.84 (0.54-1.29) | 0.41 | ||||
Low vs. high pupil socioeconomic composition**** | 0.63 (0.43-0.90) | 0.01 | ||||
Pupil school satisfaction | ||||||
1 Poor at both times, 22 schools (n = 414) | 1.00 = Referent | |||||
2 Good at both times, 36 schools (n = 619) | 1.00 (0.69-1.44) | 0.99 | ||||
3 Negative change; from good to poor, 13 schools (n = 232) | 1.78 (1.13-2.81) | 0.01 | ||||
4 Positive change; from poor to good, 22 schools (n = 413) | 1.44 (0.98-2.11) | 0.06 | ||||
Pupils being bullied | ||||||
1 Poor at both times, 27 schools (n = 501) | Referent | |||||
2 Good at both times, 29 schools (n = 488) | 1.15 (0.79-1.69) | 0.47 | ||||
3 Negative change; from good to poor, 18 schools (n = 350) | 0.97 (0.68-1.40) | 0.89 | ||||
4 Positive change; from poor to good, 19 schools (n = 339) | 0.90 (0.60-1.36) | 0.61 | ||||
Pupils bullying others | ||||||
1 Poor at both times, 28 schools (n = 464) | Referent | |||||
2 Good at both times, 28 schools (n = 549) | 0.96 (0.66-1.40) | 0.83 | ||||
3 Negative change; from good to poor, 16 schools (n = 287) | 1.51 (1.01-2.25) | 0.04 | ||||
4 Positive change; from poor to good, 21 schools (n = 378) | 1.42 (0.97-2.08) | 0.07 | ||||
Indoor air quality | ||||||
1 Poor at both times, 28 schools (n = 485) | 1.00 = Referent | Referent | Referent | |||
2 Good at both times, 37 schools (n = 699) | 0.60 (0.45-0.79) | <0.001 | 0.63 (0.46-0.86) | 0.003 | 0.61 (0.45-0.85) | 0.003 |
3 Negative change; from good to poor, 7 schools (n = 121) | 0.80 (0.50-1.30) | 0.37 | 0.78 (0.50-1.30) | 0.34 | 0.80 (0.47-1.35) | 0.40 |
4 Positive change; from poor to good, 21 schools (n = 373) | 0.59 (0.42-0.83) | 0.002 | 0.64 (0.45-0.92) | 0.02 | 0.60 (0.41-0.88) | 0.009 |