Skip to main content

Table 2 Gender differences in the knowledge about the health effects of FC and the attitude towards the practice

From: When female circumcision comes to the West: Attitudes toward the practice among Somali Immigrants in Oslo

Variables

Women (%)

Men (%)

P-value

Education

   

University

4.5

11.8

P < 0.02*

Secondary

46.4

60.2

 

Primary

38.4

21.5

 

No formal education

10.7

6.5

 

Marital status

   

Single

31.5

53.8

P < 0.03*

Married

40.5

32.3

 

Divorced

26.1

9.7

 

Widowed

1.8

4.2

 

Years in Norway

   

>14

20.2

14

P < 0.001*

10-14

29.4

19.4

 

5-9

34.8

23.6

 

0-4

15.6

43

 

Knowledge of health effects of FGM

   

Infection

   

Yes

95.1

95.7

P < 0.594

No

4.9

4.3

 

Complications in child birth

   

Yes

92.5

95.8

P < 0.293

No

7.5

4.2

 

Urine retention

   

Yes

90.2

93.4

P < 0.316

No

9.8

6.6

 

Yes

90.3

91.9

P < 0.456

No

9.7

8.1

 

HIV transmission

   

Yes

95.3

96.4

P < 0.496

No

4.7

3.6

 

Attitude towards FGM

   

None of FC forms are religious duty

70

47.3

P < 0.002*

One/both forms are religious duty

30

52.7

 

Does FC Preserve the dignity of girls?

   

None of the forms do

73.6

55.4

P < 0.006*

One/both forms do

26.4

44.6

 

Does FC prevent premarital sex

   

Yes

71.4

64.5

P < 0.183

No

28.6

35.5

 

Necessary for marriageability of girls

   

Yes

58.6

58.1

P < 0.528

No

41.4

41.9

 
  1. *Statistically significant at P < 0.05.