From: Transferability of interventions in health education: a review
Categorization of factors | Sub-categories or examples of factors | Source authors |
---|---|---|
Factors related to population | Factors related to the representativeness and characteristics of the target population (Reach RE-AIM): age, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, income, health status | Glasgow 2004, Estabrooks 2003, Glasgow 2003, Klesges 2008, Bull 2003, Eakin 2002, Dzewaltowski 2004, Elford 2003; Wang, 2006; Cuijpers 2005; Rychetnik, 2002; |
Factors related to participation of the population (Adoption of RE-AIM): perceived benefits, incentive group, a positive atmosphere within the program, the program seen as a priority | Glasgow 2004, Estabrooks 2003, Glasgow 2003, Klesges 2008, Bull 2003, Eakin 2002, Dzewaltowski 2004, Zubrick, 2005; Buijs 2003 | |
Volunteerism and the autonomy of participants | Buijs 2003 | |
Cultural factors related to lifestyles and worldviews | Reinschmidt 2010, Rychetnik, 2002; Elford 2003; | |
Cognitive factors depending on the age of recipients and their language, literacy, educational achievement | Reinschmidt 2010, Wang, 2006; Rychetnik 2002, Elford 2003 | |
Affective - motivational factors related to gender, ethnicity, religion and socioeconomic level | Reinschmidt 2010 | |
Factors related to the implementation | Factors associated with all the resources and practices required to implement the intervention, including the cost and duration (Implementation of RE-AIM) | Glasgow 2004, Estabrooks 2003, Glasgow 2003, Klesges 2008, Bull 2003, Eakin 2002, Dzewaltowski 2004, Zubrick, 2005; Wang, 2005; Elford 2003 |
Availability of resources for routine application of the intervention | ||
Adaptability to the characteristics of the population | Tsey, 2005 | |
Adaptability of the program to local realities | Buijs 2003, Tsey 2005; Elford 2003 | |
"Comfort,” that is, an optimal intervention environment | Buijs 2003 | |
Mobilization methods that could vary depending on the characteristics of beneficiaries | Perrin 2006 | |
Compensation for the participation of professionals and beneficiaries | Perrin 2006 | |
Language used appropriate to the culture and origin of participants | Perrin 2006 | |
Accessibility of the intervention | Zubrick, 2005; Rychetnick, 2002; Elford 2003 | |
Relevance of the intervention to influence the risk factor and/or problem | Zubrick, 2005 | |
Feasibility of the intervention | Zubrick, 2005 : Elford 2003; | |
Acceptability of the intervention | Zubrick, 2005; Wang, 2005; Elford 2003; | |
Factors related to intervention: its model, its development, its delivery | Rychetnick 2002 | |
Factors related to professionals | Providing all required instructions and intervention materials | Mukoma 2009, Cuijpers 2005 |
A participatory training that takes into account the professionals’ diverse views and experiences and targets their attitudes, skills and self-efficacy to implement the intervention | Mukoma 2009, Perrin 2006, Cuijpers 2005, | |
Involving professionals in developing and piloting the lessons, and reviewing the research instruments, skills. | Mukoma 2009, Wang, 2006; Rychetnick 2002 | |
Interest earned from the program by professionals in terms of their practice | Cuijpers 2005 | |
Enjoyment of the professionals | Buijs 2003 | |
Factors related to the environment | Environmental factors related to the systemic dimension of the community | Reinschmidt 2010 |
Recognition of unique institutional settings | Perrin 2006 | |
Factors related to politico-social context (health system, financing, services or existing alternative program, etc.). | Rychetnick 2002, Wang, 2006; Cuijpers 2005, Wang, 2006; | |
Factors associated with interaction between the intervention and context | Rychetnick 2002 | |
Factors related to a specific health problem | Prevalence of health problem in the population | Zubrick, 2005; Wang, 2005 |
Prevalence of risk factors for the targeted health problem | Zubrick, 2005 | |
Convincing causal link between the risk factor that is the target of the intervention and the health problem | Zubrick, 2005 | |
Relevance of the problem statement to be treated by professionals (expert agreement) | Cuijpers 2005 |