Skip to main content

Table 4 Predictors of subsequent behavioural actions engaging with campaign a (binary yes/no) (n = 83**)

From: Mass social contact interventions and their effect on mental health related stigma and intended discrimination

 

Individual social contact elements

Individual social contact elements

Individual social contact elements

Individual social contact elements

Additive social contact

OR(95% CI)

OR(95% CI)

OR(95% CI)

OR(95% CI)

OR(95% CI)

Age

1.0 (1.0, 1.1)

1.0 (1.0, 1.1)

1.0 (0.9, 1.1)

1.0 (0.9, 1.1)

1.0 (1.0, 1.1)

Gender

0.4 (0.1, 2.0)

0.7 (0.1, 3.6)

0.6 (0.1, 2.9)

0.6 (0.1, 3.0)

0.6 (0.1, 2.9)

BME

0.6 (0.1, 3.8)

0.7 (0.1, 3.7)

0.7 (0.1, 3.8)

0.8 (0.2, 3.8)

0.7 (0.1, 3.7)

Experience of Mental Health Problems (yes/no)

0.8 (0.2, 3.6)

1.2 (0.3, 5.4)

1.1 (0.2, 4.7 )

1.1 (0.3, 4.6)

1.0 (0.2, 4.6)

Specific Social contact Factors

 Equal Status

*7.0 (1.6, 31.3)

--

--

--

--

 Common Goals

--

2.3 (0.9, 5.8)

--

--

--

 Intergroup cooperation

--

--

1.9 (0.8, 4.5)

--

--Sus

 Friendship potential

--

--

--

1.1 (0.3, 4.6)

--

Quality of Social contact (Number of factors)

--

--

--

--

*1.4 (1.0,1.9)

Initial RIBS Score

*1.3 (1.0, 1.7)

*1.4 (1.1, 1.8)

*1.4 (1.0, 1.8)

*1.4 (1.0, 1.8)

*1.4 (1.0, 1.7)

Initial willingness to disclose

0.8 (0.5, 1.2)

0.9 (0.6, 1.3)

0.8 (0.6, 1.3)

0.9 (0.6, 1.3)

0.8 (0.6, 1.3)

  1. *p <0.05
  2. asubsequent behavioural actions engaging with campaign refer to the following actions: visiting the TTC website, pledging support via the TTC visual pledge, talking with others about the TTC event, or following TTC on Facebook or Twitter