Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 Predictors of subsequent behavioural actions engaging with campaign a (binary yes/no) (n = 83**)

From: Mass social contact interventions and their effect on mental health related stigma and intended discrimination

  Individual social contact elements Individual social contact elements Individual social contact elements Individual social contact elements Additive social contact
OR(95% CI) OR(95% CI) OR(95% CI) OR(95% CI) OR(95% CI)
Age 1.0 (1.0, 1.1) 1.0 (1.0, 1.1) 1.0 (0.9, 1.1) 1.0 (0.9, 1.1) 1.0 (1.0, 1.1)
Gender 0.4 (0.1, 2.0) 0.7 (0.1, 3.6) 0.6 (0.1, 2.9) 0.6 (0.1, 3.0) 0.6 (0.1, 2.9)
BME 0.6 (0.1, 3.8) 0.7 (0.1, 3.7) 0.7 (0.1, 3.8) 0.8 (0.2, 3.8) 0.7 (0.1, 3.7)
Experience of Mental Health Problems (yes/no) 0.8 (0.2, 3.6) 1.2 (0.3, 5.4) 1.1 (0.2, 4.7 ) 1.1 (0.3, 4.6) 1.0 (0.2, 4.6)
Specific Social contact Factors
 Equal Status *7.0 (1.6, 31.3) -- -- -- --
 Common Goals -- 2.3 (0.9, 5.8) -- -- --
 Intergroup cooperation -- -- 1.9 (0.8, 4.5) -- --Sus
 Friendship potential -- -- -- 1.1 (0.3, 4.6) --
Quality of Social contact (Number of factors) -- -- -- -- *1.4 (1.0,1.9)
Initial RIBS Score *1.3 (1.0, 1.7) *1.4 (1.1, 1.8) *1.4 (1.0, 1.8) *1.4 (1.0, 1.8) *1.4 (1.0, 1.7)
Initial willingness to disclose 0.8 (0.5, 1.2) 0.9 (0.6, 1.3) 0.8 (0.6, 1.3) 0.9 (0.6, 1.3) 0.8 (0.6, 1.3)
  1. *p <0.05
  2. asubsequent behavioural actions engaging with campaign refer to the following actions: visiting the TTC website, pledging support via the TTC visual pledge, talking with others about the TTC event, or following TTC on Facebook or Twitter