Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Predictors of Improved RIBS Score (binary yes/no) (n = 83)

From: Mass social contact interventions and their effect on mental health related stigma and intended discrimination

  Individual social contact elements Individual social contact elements Individual social contact elements Individual social contact elements Additive social contact
OR(95% CI) OR(95% CI) OR(95% CI) OR(95% CI) OR(95% CI)
Age 1.1 (1.0, 1.1) 1.1 (1.0, 1.1) 1.1(1.0, 1.1) 1.1 (1.0, 1.1) 1.1 (1.0, 1.1)
Gender 1.5 (0.2, 9.9) 2.0 (0.3, 2.8) 1.6 (0.2, 0.7) 1.8 (0.3, 2.7) 1.6 (0.2, 1.0)
BME 5.6 (1.0, 31.5) 6.1 (1.1, 33.3) 6.7 (1.1, 9.2) 6.0 (1.1, 3.1) 6.1 (1.1, 4.5)
Experience of Mental Health Problems (yes/no) 2.0 (0.4, 10.0) 2.7 (0.5, 13.6) 2.5 (0.5, 12.4) 2.1 (0.4, 10.8) 2.3 (0.5, 11.6)
Facilitating Social contact Factorsa      
 Equal Status Common 2.4 (0.7, 7.7) -- -- -- --
 Goals -- 2.0 (0.9, 4.7) -- -- --
 Intergroup cooperation -- -- *2.5 (1.1, 5.9) -- --
 Friendship potential -- -- -- 2.8 (0.6, 11.8) --
Quality of Social contact (Number of factors) -- -- -- -- *1.4 (1.0, 1.8)
Initial RIBS Score 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3) 1.0 (0.8, 1.3)
Initial willingness to disclose 1.0 (0.6, 1.5) 1.0 (0.6, 1.5) 1.0 (0.6, 1.5) 1.0 (0.6, 1.5) 1.0 (0.6, 1.5)
  1. p < 0.05
  2. afacilitating social contact conditions refer tothe specific conditions theorised by Allport and Pettigrew as being associated with optimal social contact