Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicole Bergen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
12 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
15 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicole Bergen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
15 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
27 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - sylvie gadeyne |
4 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Herman Van Oyen |
2 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Nicole Bergen |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
16 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - sylvie gadeyne |
21 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Herman Van Oyen |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Publishing | ||
30 May 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Jun 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-474 |
You can find further information about peer review here.