Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
28 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Cameron |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
2 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
21 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Cameron |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
29 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jette Moller |
3 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jan Buitenhuis |
23 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marjan Vaez |
15 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Cameron |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
15 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jette Moller |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
10 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Cameron |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
10 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
12 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Cameron |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
12 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
13 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Cameron |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
13 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
16 Jan 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Jan 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-36 |
You can find further information about peer review here.