Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 2 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Cameron |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 2 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 21 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Cameron |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 21 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 29 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jette Moller |
| 3 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jan Buitenhuis |
| 23 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marjan Vaez |
| 15 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Cameron |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 15 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 4 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jette Moller |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 10 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Cameron |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 10 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 12 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Cameron |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 12 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| 13 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ian Cameron |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| 13 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
| Publishing | ||
| 16 Jan 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 16 Jan 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-36 |
You can find further information about peer review here.