BMC Public Health

Table 3 Fixed-effect regression estimates of the effects of workplace smoking bans on work-related stress among non-smokers

From: The association between workplace smoking bans and self-perceived, work-related stress among smoking workers

	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3
Whole sample
Full ban	-0.057	-0.056	-0.035
	(-0.434-0.320)	(-0.435-0.323)	(-0.412-0.342)
Partial ban	-0.023	-0.030	-0.025
	(-0.418-0.371)	(-0.427-0.366)	(-0.420-0.370)
Observations	21345	21345	21345
Males
Full ban	0.032	0.029	0.072
	(-0.439-0.503)	(-0.445-0.504)	(-0.399-0.543)
Partial ban	0.011	-0.002	0.021
	(-0.471-0.494)	(-0.488-0.484)	(-0.460-0.504)
Observations	10256	10256	10256
Females
Full ban	-0.201	-0.189	-0.188
	(-0.799-0.397)	(-0.785-0.408)	(-0.787-0.410)
Partial ban	-0.105	-0.091	-0.103
	(-0.748-0.539)	(-0.731-0.549)	(-0.745-0.539)
Observations	11089	11089	11089
Age 18-40
Full ban	-0.226	-0.199	-0.222
	(-0.868-0.415)	(-0.847-0.449)	(-0.872-0.428)
Partial ban	-0.199	-0.209	-0.246
	(-0.870-0.471)	(-0.886-0.468)	(-0.923-0.431)
Observations	9557	9557	9557
Age 41-65
Full ban	-0.131	-0.137	-0.107
	(-0.595-0.334)	(-0.603-0.329)	(-0.573-0.359)
Partial ban	-0.027	-0.036	-0.014
	(-0.510-0.455)	(-0.520-0.446)	(-0.497-0.468)
Observations	11788	11788	11788

Confidence intervals are in parentheses. *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1. Model 1 is the baseline specification which controls for income level, educational level, marital status, age, work status, ethnicity, drinking status. While model 2 includes additional covariates: individual's health status, number of chronic conditions and provincial fixed effects. In addition to model 2, occupational fixed effects are included in model 3. All estimations are weighted using the sample weight available in the NPHS. Data source: Statistics Canada NPHS, wave 4(2000) to wave 8(2008)

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us

Submission enquiries: bmcpublichealth@biomedcentral.com
General enquiries: ORSupport@springernature.com