Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 May 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 2 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Pronyk |
| 31 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kavita Singh |
| 5 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ingvild Sandøy |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 5 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 7 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ingvild Sandøy |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 7 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 16 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Paul Pronyk |
| 18 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kavita Singh |
| 9 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ingvild Sandøy |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 12 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ingvild Sandøy |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 12 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 22 Nov 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1030 |
You can find further information about peer review here.