Skip to main content

Table 2 Studies of the effect of Basic or Comprehensive Emergency Obstetric Care on perinatal-neonatal mortality or intrapartum-related outcomes

From: Care during labor and birth for the prevention of intrapartum-related neonatal deaths: a systematic review and Delphi estimation of mortality effect

Author

Study Years

Setting

Study Design

Intervention definition

Concurrent interventions

Intervention Coverage

Total Births

A) Endline

B) Baseline

Outcomes

Effect on outcome

RR/OR

(95% CI)

Ronsmans 2010[37]

1987-2005

Matlab, Bangladesh

Observational cross-sectional

1987-1996: skilled home birth care w/midwives providing antenatal care, basic obstetric care (labor monitoring), essential newborn care; 1996 onwards facility based birth with BEmOC (partograph, active management 3rd stage, antibiotics, management preeclampsia). Highest level care received (BEmOC, CEmOC, vs no skilled care)

Antepartum care, Essential newborn care, Strengthening of referral and transport systems

CEmOC 0.5% in 1987 to 11.7% in 2005

BEmOC 4.7% in 1987 to 40.9% in 2005

CEmOC 3084;

BEmOC 9954;

No skilled Care 40177

1) ENMR

2) Stillbirth

1)CEmOC aOR 2.69 (2.16-3.37)

BEmOC aOR 1.47 (1.27-3.37)

2) CEmOC aOR 6.61(5.62-7.79)

BEmOC aOR 1.51(1.31-1.73)

Berglund 2010[44]

2003-2004

3 Maternity Hospitals; Ukraine

Observational before-after

Training all maternity staff (obstetricians, neonataologists, midwives, anesthesiologists) in 2 week WHO "Effective Perinatal Care" program, including use of partogram, emergency obstetric and neonatal care (resuscitation).

Anesthesia; neonatal resuscitation & special care, thermoregulation

All maternity staff in 3 hospitals

A) 1696

B) 2439

1) ENMR

No significant effect

Hounton

2008[38, 39, 52]

2001-2005

Rural Ouargaye and Diapaga districts, Burkina Faso

Quasi-experimental

Upgrading of hospital, health centers in intervention area. Mid-level, referral facilities: emergency obstetric care training. First-level centers: training in prevention of complications and early detection -referral for emergencies. Quality improvement infrastructure upgrading, equipment and supplies

National policies and guidelines;

Mobilising/educating communities to plan for and use maternal health services

Training in 1 district hospital and 13/19 health centers

18,658 births intervention district 2004-5;

21,788 births comparison district 2004-5

1) PMR

1) OR 0.75(0.70-0.80)

Draycott 2006 [41]

1998-2003

South Mead Hospital, UK

Before-after

EOC training course: CTG interpretation, course of action, obstetric emergency drills (dystocia, PPH, eclampsia, twins, breech, resuscitation)

 

Mandatory course for all midwives

A) 11030

B) 8430

1) HIE (MacLennan):

1) RR 0.50(0.26-0.95)

Edmond 2002[42]

1995-1998

Natal, Northeast Brazil

Observational before-after

Opening of primary maternity facilities at polyclinic to serve low risk deliveries in the community. Pre-booking of deliveries of high risk pregnancies at Maternity hospital with CEmOC capacity.

ANC, community health agents training in community health clinics

Deliveries at maternity clinics increased from 0% to 51%

A) 536

B) 679

1) ENMR

2) Stillbirth

3) PMR

1) RR 0.12 (0.04-0.40)

2) RR 0.66 (0.47-0.94)

3) RR 0.52 (0.37-0.73)

McCord 2001[43]

1996-1999

Rural Maharashtra, India

Cross-sectional

Comparison of perinatal mortality among births occurring at home vs. in hospital, some with CEmOC

 

85% home births, 15% in hospital.

Home: 2436

Hospital: 425

1) PMR

PMR 27.1 (home births) vs 87 (hospital deliveries)

Koblinsky 1999[40]

1957-1990s

Malaysia

Historical-ecological

1960 s Training of professional village midwives, linking to regional clinics, referral to district hospitals; 1980's shift to facility births with BEmOC

3 decades of perinatal care and obstetric care upgrading

95% of births by midwives (1996); 80% of risk deliveries in hospital (1998)

NS

1) NMR

NMR from 75.5 (1957) to 14.8 (1991)

Korhonen 1994[45]

1986-1991

Helsinki, Finland

Cross-sectional

Emergency Caesarean Team in Hospital vs. On call (out of hospital, 10 minute average delay)

 

NS

60 in hospital;

41 on call

1) Fetal Death;

2) HIE

3 in utero fetal deaths and 1 HIE in control (on-call) group vs 0 hospital

Piekkala 1985[1]

1968-1982

University Hospital, Turku Finland

Historical

15 year improvement in obstetric management: Cesearean rate increase from 4-12%; vaginal breech delivery from 4 to 1%; implementation of antepartum CTG (monitoring increase from 0 to 90%)

Corticosteroids, Neonatal intensive care, respiratory therapy, fluid-nutritional therapy

Referral hospital for 10% of population

A) 5,410

B) 5,996

1) PMR

2) Intrapartum mortality

1) RR 0.39

2) RR 0.29