Peer Review reports
From: The cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nefyn Williams |
| 9 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brian Easton |
| 25 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marieke F. van Wier |
| 25 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nana Anokye |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 25 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 10 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marieke F. van Wier |
| 1 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nana Anokye |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 1 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 15 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marieke F. van Wier |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 20 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nana Anokye |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 20 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 21 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nana Anokye |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 21 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 26 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-954 |
You can find further information about peer review here.