Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip James |
14 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chrisa Arcan |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
19 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chrisa Arcan |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
19 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
6 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip James |
9 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chrisa Arcan |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
16 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chrisa Arcan |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
16 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Resubmission - Version 11 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 11 | |
22 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chrisa Arcan |
Resubmission - Version 12 | ||
22 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 12 |
Publishing | ||
23 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
23 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-951 |
You can find further information about peer review here.