Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
1 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Louise Kuhn |
15 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anna Coutsoudis |
19 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Meera Chhagan |
26 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ameena Goga |
22 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Krishna Poudel |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
22 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
25 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anna Coutsoudis |
2 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Louise Kuhn |
7 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ameena Goga |
9 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Meera Chhagan |
25 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Krishna Poudel |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
25 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
14 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Krishna Poudel |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
14 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
16 Nov 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
16 Nov 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-869 |
You can find further information about peer review here.