Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
25 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Riccardo Polosa |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
25 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
16 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Murray Laugesen |
22 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Karl E Lund |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
21 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Riccardo Polosa |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
16 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Riccardo Polosa |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
16 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
22 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Riccardo Polosa |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
22 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
25 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Riccardo Polosa |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
25 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
11 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
11 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-786 |
You can find further information about peer review here.