Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 19 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hitoshi Oshitani |
| 4 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Andrea Pugliese |
| 16 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Heath Kelly |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 19 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Heath Kelly |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 19 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 4 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Heath Kelly |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 4 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 7 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Heath Kelly |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 7 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 2 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Heath Kelly |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 2 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 3 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-78 |
You can find further information about peer review here.