Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 13 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Simon Cauchemez |
| 1 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Cooley |
| 22 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Stoto |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 22 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 29 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Philip Cooley |
| 13 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Simon Cauchemez |
| 18 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Stoto |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 18 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 26 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Stoto |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 26 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 28 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Stoto |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 28 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 1 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 1 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-73 |
You can find further information about peer review here.