Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
25 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Warren Parker |
30 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark Colvin |
30 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Loraine Townsend |
6 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Helen Epstein |
28 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dermot Maher |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
28 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
19 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Warren Parker |
24 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Helen Epstein |
6 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Loraine Townsend |
17 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dermot Maher |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
6 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dermot Maher |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
6 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
12 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dermot Maher |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
12 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
13 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dermot Maher |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
13 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
17 Aug 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
17 Aug 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-651 |
You can find further information about peer review here.