Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
7 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fenglin Cao |
19 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lawrence Lam |
21 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - George Kormas |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
14 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fenglin Cao |
14 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lawrence Lam |
6 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - George Kormas |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
6 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
15 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lawrence Lam |
22 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fenglin Cao |
19 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - George Kormas |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
19 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
25 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - George Kormas |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
25 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
27 Jul 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Jul 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-595 |
You can find further information about peer review here.