Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 6 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Kaerlev |
| 7 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Neil Pearce |
| 27 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter N. Bergman |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 6 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Kaerlev |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 6 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 14 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Kaerlev |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 14 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 20 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Linda Kaerlev |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 20 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Jul 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 Jul 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-539 |
You can find further information about peer review here.