Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya |
7 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Landon Myer |
9 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pranee Liamputtong |
13 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gail Hawkes |
20 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Diane Cooper |
22 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Rachel King |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
22 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Rachel King |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
24 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
11 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya |
20 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Rachel King |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
1 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Rachel King |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
4 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Rachel King |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
4 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
5 Jul 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Jul 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-530 |
You can find further information about peer review here.