Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
14 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
17 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Audil Rashid |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
17 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - laura campo |
28 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Qaisar Mahmood |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
10 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - laura campo |
10 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Qaisar Mahmood |
24 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Audil Rashid |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
24 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
30 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Audil Rashid |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
30 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
4 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Audil Rashid |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
4 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
7 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Audil Rashid |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
7 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
10 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Audil Rashid |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
10 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
13 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-467 |
You can find further information about peer review here.