Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in the Netherlands; the results of a consensus model

Original Submission
3 Nov 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Jit
23 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Franco Maria Ruggeri
18 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mark Rozenbaum
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mark Rozenbaum
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mark Rozenbaum
5 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Jit
5 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Franco Maria Ruggeri
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mark Rozenbaum
Resubmission - Version 5
6 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
29 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mark Rozenbaum
Resubmission - Version 6
29 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mark Rozenbaum
Resubmission - Version 7
2 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
3 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Jit
20 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Franco Maria Ruggeri
2 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mark Rozenbaum
Resubmission - Version 8
2 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
7 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mark Rozenbaum
Resubmission - Version 10
7 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Resubmission - Version 11
Submitted Manuscript version 11
9 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mark Rozenbaum
Resubmission - Version 12
9 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 12
Publishing
10 Jun 2011 Editorially accepted
10 Jun 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2458-11-462

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page