Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matt Egan |
| 4 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aleck Ostry |
| 13 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jens Peter Bonde |
| 1 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nancy Beauregard |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 1 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 5 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jens Peter Bonde |
| 12 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matt Egan |
| 15 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aleck Ostry |
| 5 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nancy Beauregard |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 5 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 19 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nancy Beauregard |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 19 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 27 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Nancy Beauregard |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 27 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 6 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 6 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-439 |
You can find further information about peer review here.