Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
22 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aydin Nazmi |
24 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - M. Maria Glymour |
16 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Chris Packard |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
14 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Aydin Nazmi |
15 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - M. Maria Glymour |
30 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Chris Packard |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
30 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
3 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - M. Maria Glymour |
9 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Chris Packard |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
11 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chris Packard |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
11 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
17 Jan 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
17 Jan 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-42 |
You can find further information about peer review here.