Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sean Semple |
| 13 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Pope |
| 14 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amna Siddiqui |
| 23 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chandrashekhar Sreeramareddy |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 23 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 9 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sean Semple |
| 14 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Pope |
| 18 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amna Siddiqui |
| 29 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chandrashekhar Sreeramareddy |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 29 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 11 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chandrashekhar Sreeramareddy |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 11 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 24 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chandrashekhar Sreeramareddy |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 24 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 26 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Chandrashekhar Sreeramareddy |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 26 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 27 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 27 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-403 |
You can find further information about peer review here.