Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 5 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Luis Nacul |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 5 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 15 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jin-Mann Lin |
| 19 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joanne Reeve |
| 7 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Luis Nacul |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 7 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 14 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joanne Reeve |
| 30 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jin-Mann Lin |
| 25 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Luis Nacul |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 11 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Luis Nacul |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 11 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 17 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Luis Nacul |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 17 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 20 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Luis Nacul |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 20 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 27 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 27 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-402 |
You can find further information about peer review here.