Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 18 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amy McQueen |
| 29 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Hoffmeister |
| 24 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Tess Gregory |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 24 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 30 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Hoffmeister |
| 3 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Amy McQueen |
| 7 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Tess Gregory |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 7 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 14 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Tess Gregory |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 14 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 15 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Tess Gregory |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 15 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 14 Jan 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 14 Jan 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-38 |
You can find further information about peer review here.