Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
19 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Margarida Matos |
27 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maria Ines Varela-Silva |
5 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Amad Khan |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
19 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Margarida Matos |
31 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - KAUSHIK BOSE |
20 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ana LuÃsa Pereira |
19 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Amad Khan |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
19 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
19 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Amad Khan |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
19 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
2 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Amad Khan |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
2 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
10 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Amad Khan |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
10 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
22 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Amad Khan |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
22 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
24 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
24 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-379 |
You can find further information about peer review here.