Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
25 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tomas Aragon |
28 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Stoto |
19 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Eisenman |
28 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Debra Revere |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
28 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
1 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Debra Revere |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
1 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
22 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Stoto |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
15 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Debra Revere |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
15 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
18 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
18 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-337 |
You can find further information about peer review here.