Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nigel Hunt |
19 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hilary McDermott |
21 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Christine Ekenga |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
26 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Christine Ekenga |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
26 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
31 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hilary McDermott |
15 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nigel Hunt |
21 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Christine Ekenga |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
26 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Christine Ekenga |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
26 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
12 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Christine Ekenga |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
12 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
16 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
16 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-321 |
You can find further information about peer review here.