Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
21 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Damien McElvenny |
29 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hans Scheers |
13 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Mao Wang |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
13 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
4 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Damien McElvenny |
4 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hans Scheers |
9 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Mao Wang |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
9 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
13 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Mao Wang |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
13 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
25 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Mao Wang |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
25 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
12 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Mao Wang |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
12 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
16 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
16 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-319 |
You can find further information about peer review here.