Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 2 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nancy C Low |
| 5 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michèle Tremblay |
| 16 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Rima Nakkash |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 22 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michèle Tremblay |
| 24 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nancy C Low |
| 15 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Rima Nakkash |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 15 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 31 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Rima Nakkash |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 31 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 15 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Rima Nakkash |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 15 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 14 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 14 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-315 |
You can find further information about peer review here.