Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
9 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rohit Saxena |
18 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Otto Schmut |
26 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Britt-Marie Larsson |
31 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hamid Hosseini |
14 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Bente Moen |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
11 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Otto Schmut |
12 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rohit Saxena |
14 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hamid Hosseini |
9 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Ludbrook |
22 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Gordon Taylor |
26 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Bente Moen |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
26 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
15 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Ludbrook |
22 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Bente Moen |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
22 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
14 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
14 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-235 |
You can find further information about peer review here.