From: Cost-effectiveness of different human papillomavirus vaccines in Singapore
 |  |  | Source |
---|---|---|---|
 | Bivalent vaccine | Quadrivalent vaccine |  |
Reduction in the probability of HPV infection | Â | Â | Â |
Assumed proportion of HPV 16/18 in cervical cancer, A | 74.9% | 74.9% | [7] |
Vaccine efficacy-percent reduction in HPV 16/18 persistent infections, B | 95.0% | 95.0% | |
Assumed proportion of other high risk HPV in cervical cancer, C | 23.4% | 23.4% | [7] |
Vaccine efficacy-percent reduction in other high risk HPV persistent infections, D | 68.4% | 32.5% | |
Calculated reduction in the probability of HPV infection (AxB)+(CxD) | 87.2% | 78.8% | Â |
Corection factor for CIN1 | Â | Â | Â |
Percent of HPV 1618 in CIN1 cases which are caused by oncogenic HPV, E | 37.0% | Â | Â |
Correction factor for CIN1, A-E | 37.9% | Â | Â |
Corection factor for CIN2/3 | Â | Â | Â |
Percent of HPV 1618 in CIN2/3 cases which are caused by oncogenic HPV, F | 52.0% | Â | Â |
Correction factor for CIN2/3 A-F | 22.9% | Â | Â |