Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 May 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 27 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frida Eek |
| 5 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anu Kasmel |
| 27 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Simo Nayha |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 27 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 29 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frida Eek |
| 9 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Simo Nayha |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 9 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 24 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Simo Nayha |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 24 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 7 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Simo Nayha |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 7 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-153 |
You can find further information about peer review here.