Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
30 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carolyn Dewa |
31 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Angelique de Rijk |
11 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Romy Steenbeek |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
11 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Angelique de Rijk |
9 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carolyn Dewa |
13 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Romy Steenbeek |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
4 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Angelique de Rijk |
8 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Romy Steenbeek |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
8 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
21 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Romy Steenbeek |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
21 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
3 Jan 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
3 Jan 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.